A real-world study on the efficacy and safety analysis of paclitaxel liposome in advanced breast cancer / 中华肿瘤杂志

Objective: To explore the application and efficacy of paclitaxel liposome in the treatment of advanced breast cancer among Chinese population in the real world. Methods: The clinical characteristics of patients with advanced breast cancer who received paclitaxel liposome as salvage treatment from January 1, 2016 to August 31, 2019 in 11 hospitals were collected and retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was progression free survival (PFS), and the secondary outcome included objective response rate (ORR) and safety. The survival curve was drawn by Kaplan-Meier analysis and the Cox regression model were used for the multivariate analysis. Results: Among 647 patients with advanced breast cancer who received paclitaxel liposome, the first-line treatment accounted for 43.3% (280/647), the second-line treatment accounted for 27.7% (179/647), and the third-line and above treatment accounted for 29.1% (188/647). The median dose of first-line and second-line treatment was 260 mg per cycle, and 240 mg in third line and above treatment. The median period of paclitaxel liposome alone and combined chemotherapy or targeted therapy is 4 cycles and 6 cycles, respectively. In the whole group, 167 patients (25.8%) were treated with paclitaxel liposome combined with capecitabine±trastuzumab (TX±H), 123 patients (19.0%) were treated with paclitaxel liposome alone (T), and 119 patients (18.4%) were treated with paclitaxel liposome combined with platinum ± trastuzumab (TP±H), 108 patients (16.7%) were treated with paclitaxel liposome combined with trastuzumab ± pertuzumab (TH±P). The median PFS of first-line and second-line patients (5.5 and 5.5 months, respectively) were longer than that of patients treated with third line and above (4.9 months, P<0.05); The ORR of the first line, second line, third line and above patients were 46.7%, 36.8% and 28.2%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that event-free survival (EFS) and the number of treatment lines were independent prognostic factors for PFS. The common adverse events were myelosuppression, gastrointestinal reactions, hand foot syndrome and abnormal liver function. Conclusion: Paclitaxel liposomes is widely used and has promising efficacy in multi-subtype advanced breast cancer.

Hepatectomía en dos tiempos por metástasis hepáticas bilobares de origen colorrectal: reporte de un caso / Two-stage hepatectomy for bilobar colorectal liver metastases: case report / Hepatectomia em dois estágios para metástases hepáticas bilobares de origem colorretal: relato de um caso

La mitad de los pacientes con cáncer de origen colorrectal desarrollan metástasis hepáticas durante el curso de su enfermedad y de esas el 80% son irresecables. La resecabilidad se define no por la extensión de la hepatectomía, sino por la función del hígado remanente, por lo que para pacientes con ciertos factores favorables se pueden realizar técnicas de remodelación hepática para aumentar el volumen del hígado remanente para que este sea suficiente. La hepatectomía en dos tiempos se basa en procedimientos secuenciales que buscan tratar metástasis hepáticas colorrectales consideradas inicialmente irresecables, logrando la resección completa de las mismas dejando un remanente hepático funcionante suficiente, lo cual no sería posible en un solo acto quirúrgico. El objetivo de este trabajo es presentar el caso clínico de un paciente portador de metástasis hepáticas sincrónicas de origen colorrectal irresecables, que luego de una quimioterapia de conversión, con el fin de aumentar el futuro remanente hepático y evitar falla hepática postoperatoria y realizar una resección oncológica, fue sometido a una hepatectomía en dos tiempos, técnica utilizada con baja frecuencia en nuestro medio, destacando una evolución favorable, con marcadores tumorales en valores normales y sin evidencia imagenológica de recaída local ni sistémica.

Half of colorectal cancer patients develop liver metastases during the course of their disease, 80% of which are unresectable. Resectability is defined not by the extent of the hepatectomy, but by the function of the liver remnant. Therefore, for patients with certain factors, liver remodeling techniques can be performed to increase volume of the remaining liver so that it is sufficient. Two-stage hepatectomy is performed on colorectal liver metastases which are initially considered unresectable in one stage resection procedures, in which sequential procedures are performed in order to achieve complete resection and preserve a sufficient functioning liver remnant. The objective of this paper is to present the case of a patient with unresectable synchronous colorectal liver metastases, in which after conversion chemotherapy, in order to increase the future liver remnant, avoid postoperative liver failure and perform an oncological resection underwent a two-stage hepatectomy, a technique used with low frequency in our setting, highlighting a favorable evolution, with tumor markers in normal values and without imaging evidence of local or systemic relapse.

Metade dos pacientes com câncer colorretal desenvolve metástases hepáticas durante o curso da doença e, desses, 80% são irressecáveis. A ressecabilidade é definida não pela extensão da hepatectomia, mas pela função do fígado remanescente; portanto, para pacientes com certos fatores favoráveis, técnicas de remodelação hepática podem ser realizadas para aumentar o volume do fígado remanescente de forma que seja suficiente. A hepatectomia em dois estágios é baseada em procedimentos sequenciais que buscam tratar metástases hepáticas colorretais inicialmente consideradas irressecáveis, obtendo ressecção completa, deixando um remanescente hepático funcional suficiente, o que não seria possível em um único ato cirúrgico. O objetivo deste trabalho é apresentar o caso clínico de um paciente com metástases hepáticas sincrônicas irressecáveis ​​de origem colorretal, que após quimioterapia de conversão, com o objetivo de aumentar o futuro remanescente hepático e evitar insuficiência hepática pós-operatória e realizar uma ressecção oncológica, foi submetido a dois Hepatectomia em estágio, técnica utilizada com baixa frequência em nosso meio, evidenciando evolução favorável, com marcadores tumorais em valores normais e sem evidências de imagem de recidiva local ou sistêmica.

Oncological outcomes in extended time intervals between preoperative chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine and surgery in operable rectal adenocarcinoma / Resultados oncológicos en intervalos extendidos de tiempo entre quimioradioterapia preoperatoria con capecitabina y cirugía en adenocarcinoma rectal operable

Objective: To assess whether extended time intervals (8-12, 13-20 and >20 weeks) between the end of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery affect overall survival, disease-free survival. Materials and methods: Retrospective study in 120 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma without evidence of metastasis (T1-4/N0-2/M0) at the time of diagnosis that underwent surgery with curative intent after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine and obtained R0 or R1 resection between January 2010 to December 2014 at the National Cancer Institute of Peru. Dates were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method, log- rank test and Cox regression analysis. Results: Of the 120 patients, 70 were women (58%). The median age was 63(26-85) years. All received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. No significant difference was found between the association of the median radial (0.6, 0.7 and 0.8 cm; p=0.826) and distal edge (3.0, 3.5 and 4.0 cm; p=0.606) with time interval groups and similarly the mean resected (18.8, 19.1 and 16.0; p=0.239) and infiltrated nodules (1.05, 1.29 and 0.41); p=0.585). The median follow-up time of overall survival and desease free survival was 40 and 37 months, respectively. No significant differences were observed in overall survival (79.0%, 74.6% and 71.1%; p=0.66) and disease-free survival (73.7%, 68.1% and 73.6%; p=0.922) according to the three groups studied at the 3-year of follow-up. Conclusions: We found that widening the time intervals between the end of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery at 24 weeks does not affect the overall survival, disease-free survival and pathological outcomes. It allows to extend the intervals of time for future studies that finally will define the best time interval for the surgery

Objetivo: Evaluar si los intervalos de tiempo extendidos (8-12, 13-20 y >20 semanas) entre el fin de la quimioradioterapia neoadyuvante y la cirugía afectan la sobrevida global, y la sobrevida libre de enfermedad. Material y métodos: Estudio retrospectivo de 120 pacientes con adenocarcinoma rectal sin evidencia de metástasis (T1-4/N0-2/M0) al momento del diagnóstico que se sometieron a cirugía con intención curativa luego de quimioradioterapia neoadyuvante con capecitabina y tuvieron resección R0 o R1 entre enero 2010 y diciembre 2014 en el Instituto Nacioanal de Enfermedades Neoplásicas de Perú. El análisis se hizo con el método de Kaplan-Meier, la prueba log-rank y la regresión de Cox. Resultados: De 120 pacientes, 70 fueron mujeres (58%). La mediana de la edad fue 63 años (26-85 años). Todos recibieron quimioradioterapia neoadyuvante. No hubo diferencia significativa entre la asociación de las medianas de los bordes radial (0,6, 0.7 y 0,8 cm; p=0,826) y distal (3,0, 3,5 y 4,0 cm; p=0,606) con los intervalos de tiempo de los grupos y similarmente con la media de los ganglios resecados (18,8, 19,1 y 16,0; p=0,239) e infiltrados (1,05, 1,29 y 0,41; p=0,585). No se observaron diferencias significativas en sobrevida global (79,0%, 74,6% y 71,1%; p=0,66) y sobrevida libre de enfermedad (73,7%, 68,1% y 73,6%; p=0,922), en los tres grupos estudiados a 3 años de seguimiento. Conclusiones: Encontramos que aumentar los intervalos de tiempo entre el fin de la quimioradioterapia neoadyuvante y la cirugía hasta 24 semanas no afecta la sobrevida global, sobrevida libre de enfermedad ni los desenlaces patológicos. Esto permitiría extender los intervalos de tiempo en estudios futuros para definir el mejor intervalo de tiempo para la cirugía

Respuesta al tratamiento neoadyuvante con capecitabine y radioterapia en el cáncer de recto inferior localmente avanzado / Response to neoadjuvant treatment with capecitabine and radiotherapy in locally advanced lower rectal cancer

Introducción: La importancia del tratamiento neoadyuvante con quimio y radioterapia en el manejo de los tumores de recto extraperitoneal localmente avanzado ha quedado claramente demostrada. La droga que ha sido históricamente más utilizada para este fin fue el 5-Fluorouracilo (5-FU). Una nueva molécula de administración por vía oral, la prodroga capecitabine, ha reemplazado al 5-FU en el tratamiento neoadyuvante en los últimos tiempos, con mejores resultados y mayor comodidad. Objetivo: Valorar la eficacia, toxicidad y complicaciones del tratamiento neoadyuvante con capecitabine más radioterapia en el tratamiento del cáncer de recto extraperitoneal localmente avanzado. Diseño: Estudio observacional, descriptivo, retrospectivo. Población y Métodos: Se incluyeron 33 pacientes (66% de sexo masculino) con tumores de recto extraperitoneal localmente avanzado (cT3/cT4 o cN+) con indicación de neoadyuvancia. La dosis de radioterapia fue de 45 Gy más un boost de 5,04 Gy administradas en 25 sesiones durante un período de 5 semanas. La dosis de capecitabine fue de 850 mg/m2, dos veces al día durante los días en que se administraba la radioterapia. Se reevaluó a los pacientes entre la 8º y 10º semana. Aquellos pacientes con respuesta clínica completa (RCC) se les ofreció ingresar al protocolo de Watch & Wait, mientras que aquellos pacientes con respuesta clínica incompleta o nula se les indicó la resección quirúrgica entre las 10-12 semanas posttratamiento neoadyuvante. Resultados: 10 pacientes (30,3%) tuvieron respuesta clínica completa (RCC). De estos, 7 entraron a protocolo Watch & Wait. Se operaron 26 pacientes, luego de un promedio de 11,71 semanas posteriores a la neoadyuvancia, siguiendo en todos los casos la técnica de excisión total del mesorrecto. Se observó un 19,3% de RPC y un downstaging del 57,69%. A dieciséis pacientes (61,53%) se les efectuó una resección anterior ultrabaja con ostomía de protección. Nueve pacientes fueron sometidos a una amputación abdominoperineal (34,61%) y una paciente recibió una operación de Hartmann (3,84%). El principal efecto adverso fue la diarrea grado I en el 36% de los casos, seguida por la dermatitis grado I en el 33%. Tuvimos dos dehiscencias anastomóticas que se resolvieron sin reintervención. Conclusiones: El tratamiento neoadyuvante con capecitabine es una opción segura, con alta tasa de respuesta clínica y patológica completa, con escasa toxicidad y complicaciones, y el beneficio de la comodidad de su administración por vía oral. (AU)

Background: The importance of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy in the management of extraperitoneal rectal tumors locally advanced has been clearly demonstrated. The drug has been historically used for this purpose was 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). A new molecule oral administration, the prodrug capecitabine, has replaced the 5-FU in the neoadjuvant treatment in recent times, with better results and greater comfort. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy, toxicity and complications of neoadjuvant capecitabine plus radiation therapy in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer extraperitoneal. Design: Observational, descriptive, retrospective study. Population and Methods: 33 patients (66% male) with extraperitoneal rectal tumors locally advanced (cT3 / cT4 or cN +) with indication of neoadjuvant were included. Radiation dose was 45 Gy plus a boost of 5.04 Gy administered in 25 sessions over a period of 5 weeks. Capecitabine dose was 850 mg / m2 twice daily on days that radiotherapy was administered. It was reevaluated patients between the 8th and 10th week. Patients with clinical complete response (CCR) were offered to enter the protocol Watch & Wait, while patients with incomplete or no clinical response were instructed surgical resection neoadjuvant between 10-12 weeks post-treatment. Results: 10 patients (30.3%) had clinical complete response (CCR). Of these, seven entered Watch & Wait protocol. 26 patients were operated after a mean time of 11,71 weeks (range 10-15), in all cases following the total mesorectal excision technique. 19.3% of RPC and downstaging of 57.69% was observed. Sixteen patients (61.53%) were made ultra-low anterior resection with protective stoma. Nine patients underwent an AP amputation (34.61%) and one patient received a Hartmann operation(3.84%). The main side effect was diarrhea grade I in 36% of cases, followed by the degree I dermatitis in 33%. We had two anastomotic dehiscences which resolved without reoperation. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant capecitabine therapy is a safe choice, with high rate of complete clinical and pathological response with low toxicity and complications, and the benefit from the comfort of oral administration. (AU)

O tratamento oncológico e a doença arterial coronariana / Cancer treatment and coronary artery disease

A concomitância de doença arterial coronariana e câncer é uma apresentação frequente na prática da cardiologia. Além de compartilharem os mesmos fatores de risco para seu desenvolvimento e, portanto, os mesmos grupos demográficos, a toxicidade vascular da quimioterapia e da radioterapia torna mais alta a incidência da doença no grande grupo de sobreviventes do câncer. No ciclo do tratamento oncológico, a ocorrência de eventos cardíacos maiores, secundários ou não à cardiotoxicidade, é determinante de alteração ou interrupção de tratamento, com efeito importante na sobrevida. O objetivo da assistência especializada é retornar o paciente ao tratamento o mais precocemente possível e, na fase tardia, evitar a morte por doença cardiovascular. As peculiaridades da apresentação da doença coronariana e do diagnóstico e tratamento percutâneo são aqui discutidas

Concomitant coronary artery disease and cancer is a common presentation in current cardiovascular practice. Besides sharing the same risk factors for their development, and accordingly, the same demographic groups, vascular toxicity from chemotherapy and radiotherapy make the incidence of the disease higher in the large group of cancer survivors. During the cancer treatment cycle, the occurrence of major cardiac events, whether due to cardiotoxicity or not, is responsible for changes or interruption of treatment, with important effects on survival. The goal of specialized care is to return the patient to treatment as early as possible and in the later phase, to avoid death from cardiovascular disease. The specific characteristics of coronary disease and percutaneous diagnosis and treatment are discussed here

Objective Assessment of Surgical Restaging after Concurrent Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

The role of neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is still controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate surgical downstaging after concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) for LAPC by measuring the objective changes after treatment. From January 2003 through July 2011, 54 patients with LAPC underwent neoadjuvant CCRT. Computed tomography findings of the tumor size, including major vessel invasion, were analyzed before and after CCRT. Among the total recruited patients, 14 had borderline resectable malignancy and another 40 were unresectable before CCRT. After CCRT, a partial response was achieved in four patients. Stable disease and further disease progression were achieved in 36 and 14 patients, respectively. Tumor size showed no significant difference before and after CCRT (3.6 +/- 1.1 vs. 3.6 +/- 1.0 cm, P = 0.61). Vessel invasion showed improvement in two patients, while 13 other patients showed further tumor progression. Thirty-nine patients with unresectable malignancy and 11 patients with borderline resectable malignancy at time of initial diagnosis remained unchanged after CCRT. Four patients with borderline pancreatic malignancy progressed to an unresectable stage, whereas one unresectable pancreatic malignancy improved to a borderline resectable stage. Only one patient with borderline resectable disease underwent operation after CCRT; however, curative resection failed due to celiac artery invasion and peritoneal seeding. The adverse events associated with CCRT were tolerable. In conclusion, preoperative CCRT in LAPC rarely leads to surgical downstaging, and it could lower resectability rates.

ErbB2+ metastatic breast cancer treatment after progression on trastuzumab: a cost-effectiveness analysis for a developing country / Tratamientos para cáncer de seno metastásico ErbB2+ en progresión Post-Trastuzumab: Análisis de costo-efectividad para un país en vía de desarrollo

Objective Breast cancer (BC) and metastatic breast cancer (MBC) are significant causes of deaths amongst women worldwide, including developing countries. The cost of treatment in the latter is even more of an issue than in higher income countries. ErbB2 overexpression is a marker of poor prognosis and the goal for targeted therapy. This study was aimed at evaluating the cost-effectiveness in Colombia of ErbB2+ MBC treatment after progression on trastuzumab. Methods A decision analytic model was constructed for evaluating such treatment in a hypothetical cohort of ErbB2+MBC patients who progressed after a first scheme involving trastuzumab. The alternatives compared were lapatinib+capecitabine (L+C), and trastuzumab+a chemotherapy agent (capecitabine, vinorelbine or a taxane). Markov models were used for calculating progression-free time and the associated costs. Effectiveness estimators for such therapy were identified from primary studies; all direct medical costs based on national fees-guidelines were included. Sensitivity was analyzed and acceptability curves estimated. A 3 % discount rate and third-payer perspective were used within a 5-year horizon. Results L+C dominated its comparators. Its cost-effectiveness ratio was COP $49,725,045 per progression-free year. The factors most influencing the results were the alternatives' hazard ratios and the cost of trastuzumab. Conclusion Lapatinib was cost-effective compared to its alternatives for treating MBC after progression on trastuzumab using a Colombian decision analytic model.

Objetivo El cáncer de seno (CS) y cáncer de seno metastásico (CSM) son importantes causas de muerte entre las mujeres a nivel mundial y en países en vía de desarrollo. En estos últimos los costos de los tratamientos son aún más preocupantes que en países de alto ingreso. La sobreexpresión de ErbB2 es marcador de pobre pronóstico y objetivo de terapias dirigidas. Se evaluó la costo-efectividad de los tratamientos de CSM ErbB2+ en progresión post-trastuzumab en Colombia. Métodos Se desarrolló un modelo analístico de decisiones para evaluar los tratamientos en una cohorte hipotética de CSM ErbB2+ que progresaron después de un primer esquema con trastuzumab. Las alternativas comparadas fueron: lapatinib+capecitabina (L+C), y trastuzumab más un agente quimioterápico (capecitabina, vinorelbinao un taxano). Se usaron modelos de Markov para calcular el tiempo libre de progresión y los costos asociados. Estimaciones de efectividad fueron identificadas de estudios primarios. Se incluyeron todos los costos médicos directos basados en los manuales tarifarios nacionales. Se realizaron análisis de sensibilidad y curvas de aceptabilidad. Se descontaron costos y resultados a una tasa anual de 3 %, la perspectiva de análisis fue del tercer pagador y el horizonte de 5 años. Resultados L+C domina a sus comparadores con un razón de costo-efectividad de COP $49 725 045 por año libre de progresión. Los factores que más influencian los resultados son los hazard ratios de las alternativas y el costo de trastuzumab. Conclusión Lapatinib es costo-efectivo comparado con sus alternativas para el tratamiento del CSM después de la progresión con trastuzumab en el escenario colombiano.